seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of one day from the registration of FIR which has not been explained through the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness from the alleged prevalence and also the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession of the petitioners has long been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened being the real brothers of the deceased but they did not respond in the slightest degree to the confessional statements on the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, 1 after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glance much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a lot of occasions that extra judicial confession of an accused is a weak kind of evidence which could be manoeuvred from the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution can also be relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding existence of some light at the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners jointly with a motorcycle at four.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive bit of legislation that defines various criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for people found guilty.
Section 302 of your PPC deals with among the list of most really serious offenses in criminal regulation: murder. In this blog post, we will delve into the provisions of Section 302, investigate the punishment it involves, and assess some notable case laws related to this particular section.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for the accused who intentionally murdered the victim.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar difficulty. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in making use of the legislation. This example of case law refers to two cases read within the state court, for the same level.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its original purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more
Though quite a few websites offer free case law, not all are equally reliable. It’s important to evaluate the credibility on the source before counting on the information.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, would be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It involves the execution with the convicted person as being a consequence of their crime.
[3] For example, in England, the High Court plus the Court of Appeals are Every bound by their have previous decisions, however, Because the Practice Statement 1966 the Supreme Court on the United Kingdom can deviate from its earlier decisions, While in practice it almost never does. A notable example of when the court has overturned its precedent is the case of R v Jogee, where the Supreme Court of your United click here Kingdom ruled that it plus the other courts of England and Wales experienced misapplied the regulation for approximately thirty years.
Because of this, basically citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think of it as calling someone to tell them you’ve found their missing phone, then telling them you live in such-and-this sort of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving throughout the community looking to find their phone is probably going to be more frustrating than it’s truly worth.
fourteen. While in the light with the position explained over, it really is concluded that a civil servant provides a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be deemed for no fault of his very own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the length of service or during the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more